Legal Opinion
Polk v. OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 2007No. 2006AP3096-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
732 N.W.2d 419 (2007)
2007 WI 51
In re the Reinstatement of Brian K. POLK, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION, Respondent.
No. 2006AP3096-D.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Decided May 11, 2007.
¶ 1 PER CURIAM.
In this matter we are asked to review the petition by Attorney Brian K. Polk for the reinstatement of his license to practice law in this state following an administrative suspension of three or more consecutive years due to his failure to comply with the mandatory reporting requirements for continuing legal education (CLE). We determine at the conclusion of the process described below,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against HausmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KelsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- William Pangman v. Keith SellenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- William Pangman v. Keith SellenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- William Pangman v. Keith SellenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020