Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Felli

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2006No. 2004AP3382-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Jay Andrew Felli has appealed from a referee's report concluding that he engaged in professional misconduct and recommending that his license to practice law in Wisconsin he suspended for a period of 18 months. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) has cross-appealed, arguing that the referee's findings that there was insufficient evidence to prove three of the counts alleged in the OLR's complaint are clearly erroneous. In addition, the OLR asserts that the recommended 18-month suspension inadequately addresses the severity of the misconduct and that the gravity of the offenses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. GulbankianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Disciplinary Proceedings Against FelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Estate of DevroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Polk v. OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATIONWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Reinstatement of Polk v. Office of Lawyer RegulationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API