Legal Opinion
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 22, 2016No. 13-16599PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
In this case, we consider whether an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act by requiring employees to sign an agreement precluding them from bringing, in any forum, a concerted legal claim regarding wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment. We conclude that it does, and vacate the order of the district court compelling individual arbitration.
I
Stephen Morris and Kelly McDaniel worked for the accounting firm Ernst & Young. As a condition of employment, Morris and McDaniel were required to sign agreements not to join with other employees in…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Saizhang Guan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.