Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 2, 2016No. 15-2820-cvUnpublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant-appellee Raymours Furniture Company, Inc. (“Raymours”) requires all its employees, as a condition of their employment, to participate in the company’s Employment Arbitration Program (“EAP”), which requires that employees submit all employment and compensation-related claims to arbitration. The EAP also mandates that such claims be decided on an individual basis. 1 The EAP does not, however, prevent employees from filing charges or participating in investigations conducted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and/or state or local human rights agencies, nor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Linwood WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Jacob Lewis v. Epic Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Castellanos v. Raymours Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Faggiano v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Spano v. V & J National Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Gold v. New York Life Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.