Legal Opinion

Saizhang Guan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 23, 2017No. 16-CV-598 (PKC) (CLP)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge:

Plaintiffs are car service drivers (“drivers”) who have brought this lawsuit, as a putative class action, alleging breach of contract by Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Uber”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and this action is stayed pending arbitration.

BACKGROUND

1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiffs’ Agreements with Uber

Uber is a technology company that allows drivers and potential riders to connect through a…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Applebaum v. LYFT, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Paragon Litig. Trust v. Noble Corp. PLC (In re Paragon Offshore PLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  3. Armor All/STP Prods. Co. v. Tsi Prods., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  4. Temple v. Best Rate Holdings LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
  5. Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. QuagginDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API