Legal Opinion
Almir Puce v. City of Burnsville, MN., A21-0895, Supreme Court. September 28, 2023.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 28, 2023No. A210895Published
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A21-0895 Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Almir Puce, Respondent, vs. Filed: September 28, 2023 Office of Appellate Courts City of Burnsville, MN., Appellant. ________________________ Stephen W. Cooper, Stacey R. Everson, The Cooper Law Firm, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. Paul D. Reuvers, Jason J. Kuboushek, Andrew A. Wolf, Iverson Reuvers, Bloomington, Minnesota, for appellant. Patricia Y. Beety, Susan L. Naughton, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae League of Minnesota…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.