Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Blumenstein
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 26, 1981No. 103,274, CA 18864PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
This is an action for breach of contract. Defendants had contracted to build a new residence for plaintiffs in Salem. Plaintiffs claimed damages for defects in the house, caused by defendants’ alleged failure to construct it in a good and workmanlike manner, and sought reimbursement for sums plaintiffs spent on its construction. Defendants counterclaimed for the amount due on the contract, the reasonable value of extra work performed on the Salem house and the reasonable value of work performed on plaintiffs’ other house in Mill City, Oregon.
The trial court found for each party on some, but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Holman Transfer Co. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Ogden v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.