Legal Opinion

Scheele v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1963No. 307PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

We are asked in this case to apply retrospectively the rule we laid down in City of Fairbanks v. Schaible, 1 that a municipal corporation in Alaska does not enjoy immunity from tort liability in the exercise of either proprietary or governmental functions.

The plaintiff-appellant complained in the court below that on September 29, 1960, she had suffered personal injuries arising out of police brutality following her arrest. The city and two of its police officérs, who had been named with it as defendants, answered denying the charge of brutality and alleging that the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API