Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. P.G.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1999No. S-8123PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Six years after Ray Ferguson admitted paternity of Paul Gold and a paternity judgment was entered against Ferguson, blood tests excluded Ferguson as Paul’s father. Ferguson then sought relief from the superior court, which vacated the paternity judgment and ordered the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) to cease collecting future child support, but refused to extinguish the arrearages that had accrued under the judgment. Because Ferguson sought and received relief only under Alas-. ka Civil Rule 60(b)(5), and argued only that the judgment should…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jones v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Atcherian v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API