Legal Opinion
Gilbank v. Benton
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1935No. Civ. 10495PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Defendant obtained a judgment in November, 1933, against Ruether-Graham Feed Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Feed Company). He secured a writ of execution and on February 21, 1934, the sheriff levied upon certain property of the Feed Company which defendant claims to be not capable of manual delivery. A keeper was placed in charge of the property and on February 24, 1934, one Wheeler filed with the sheriff his verified third party claim to the property levied upon. The sheriff promptly notified defendant of the third party claim and demanded that an undertaking in the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frankel v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brusie v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Duncan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Braden v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hooper v. McDadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lavino v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Service v. TrombettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lannan v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Ruskin v. CheneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Lavino v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956