Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Boyd

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1895No. 19525PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is a bill in equity to obtain a decree adjudging certain lands of the defendant S. J. Boyd liable to the satisfaction of a demand of plaintiff for six hundred dollars and interest.

Plaintiff had a decree, as prayed for, from which decree and from an order denying her motion for a new trial said defendant S. J. Boyd appeals.

For many years prior to January 30, 1891, the defendants herein were husband and wife, and the owners of, as community property, a tract of land in the county of Los Angeles, of the value of say fifty thousand dollars, upon which they resided with their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. S.F. Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jones' Adm'r v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Packard v. ArellanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Panaud v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  5. In re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mayberry v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API