Legal Opinion

Hooper v. McDade

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1905No. 73PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

The plaintiff seeks by this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the failure on the part of the defendant McDade to perform certain acts as sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco. The other defendants are sureties upon the official bond of McDade.

In an action in the superior court for the city and county of San Francisco for the foreclosure of a mortgage, in which the Western Loan Association was plaintiff and Flavien Vanderveken et al. (including George W. Hooper, the plaintiff herein) were defendants, judgment was rendered that the mortgaged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leviston v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Raker v. BucherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frohman v. BonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Lampley v. AlvaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Gilbank v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Ewing v. Richvale Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API