Legal Opinion

Brusie v. Gates

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1889No. 13164PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action to quiet title. The title of the respondent depends upon the validity of the levy of a writ of attachment on the property in the hands of the appellant’s grantor and the subsequent sale of the same on execution. The attachment issued out of the justice’s court, judgment was recovered, and subsequently recorded in the recorder’s office of the proper county; an execution was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff, and the property sold to the respondent, who was the judgment creditor. The property was purchased by the appellant from the judgment debtor for a valuable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ritter v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Hyatt v. ColkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Phillips v. MenottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API