Legal Opinion
Lavino v. Jamison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1956No. 14385PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment which denied appellants recovery for the alleged seizure of their property by the Collector of Internal Revenue to satisfy the taxes of another person1 and *911from the denial of appellants’ motion for a new trial. The district court granted a motion to dismiss at the conclusion of appellants’ case on the ground that they had failed to prove that the Collector had seized their property. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 41(b), 28 U.S. C.A. Appellants contend that they made a prima facie showing of this fact, that this showing was not overcome by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Long v. RasmussenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
- Stuart v. Chinese Chamber of Commerce of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Cleaves v. FunkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claudia Walker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, and Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Cohen v. Brandywine Raceway AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Francis L. Moylan and Yuk Lan Moylan v. Angelina SicilianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- C. Martin Welch v. Eugene L. GrindleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.