Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Nowling

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 4, 1958No. 9907Published

1DissentLatimeR, Judge

I dissent.

The interpretation of Article 31 has been a source of considerable difficulty to those administering military law and this case answers wrongly the critical problem of how to balance the right of the military services to grant privileges to their personnel and at the same time retain some control over those who abuse the favor. If a pass is the evidence which permits one on active duty to establish his privilege to liberty from his unit, those charged with the responsibility of maintaining law and order should possess the authority to require him to produce his credentials. For many…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. GreerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. HolmesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API