Legal Opinion

United States v. Holmes

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 1, 1955No. 6400PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 67 (&) (2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 654, The Judge Advocate General of the United States Air Force has filed a certificate seeking review of certain questions of law in this case,

Airman Holmes, the accused, needed 'gasoline for his car. He decided to obtain it by “moonlight requisition.” First, he got a twenty-five gallon drum, and then he proceeded to a parking lot at the Briggs Air Force Base. There, he went directly to a water sprinkler truck, He removed the cap and strainer *154from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. SoukupUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. VillasenorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. BallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. NowlingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. InsaniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. HarmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. DialUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. MusguireUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API