Legal Opinion
Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 12, 2018No. 2016-2197PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stoll, Circuit Judge.
Exmark Manufacturing Company filed suit against Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, alleging infringement of, inter alia, claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,987,863. The district court entered summary judgment that claim 1 was not invalid because the claim survived multiple reexaminations involving the same prior art. The district court also denied summary judgment of indefiniteness with respect to claim l. 1 The case proceeded to a jury trial, where the jury found that Briggs willfully infringed Exmark’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Omega Patents, LLC v. Calamp Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.