Legal Opinion
Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 19, 2018No. 2016-2599PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Newman.
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Stoll.
Enplas Display Device Corporation appeals the district court's summary judgment that claim 20 of Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.'s ("SSC")
*402 U.S. Patent No. 6,007,209 is not anticipated. Following a jury trial on the remaining infringement and invalidity issues, Enplas also appeals the district court's denial of judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") that SSC's U.S. Patent No. 6,473,554 is anticipated; denial of JMOL of no induced infringement; and denial of JMOL that…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Omega Patents, LLC v. Calamp Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Inguran, LLC v. Abs Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.