United States v. Jose De Jesus Valadez-Camarena
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
In late October 1997, Jose de Jesus Vala-dez-Camerena was on trial for conspiracy, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A). In the middle of the trial, the government questioned an expert witness beyond the scope allowed by the judge. Mr. Valadez-Camarena moved for a mistrial, which was granted. He subsequently contended the Double Jeopardy Clause barred retrial because the prosecutor had goaded defense counsel into requesting a mistrial. After the district court held the prosecutor had…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Felipe Rivera, United States of America v. Homer Willis Kelly, United States of America v. Ludvig DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Babatunde Nathaniel BeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Valadez-CamarenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Sullins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.