Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose De Jesus Valadez-Camarena

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1998No. 97-2366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.

In late October 1997, Jose de Jesus Vala-dez-Camerena was on trial for conspiracy, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A). In the middle of the trial, the government questioned an expert witness beyond the scope allowed by the judge. Mr. Valadez-Camarena moved for a mistrial, which was granted. He subsequently contended the Double Jeopardy Clause barred retrial because the prosecutor had goaded defense counsel into requesting a mistrial. After the district court held the prosecutor had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Felipe Rivera, United States of America v. Homer Willis Kelly, United States of America v. Ludvig DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Babatunde Nathaniel BeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Valadez-CamarenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sullins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API