Legal Opinion
United States v. Valadez-Camarena
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 5, 2005No. 04-2113PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the appellant’s brief and the appellate record, 1 this panel has determined unanimously that oral argu ment would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant appeals from a district court order denying his “Motion for Validation of the Indictment” and “Motion for Production of Public Records Documents.” The district court held that Defendant’s post-judgment attack on his indictment was untimely under the rules of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The United States of America v. Robert Eldridge Marshall and Evelyn KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Anna Mae Hines, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Francis RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Balwinder KahlonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America v. Gerold Lee Wolff, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Gregorio MachadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TonyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Thongsouk Theng LattanaphomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Gonzalez-BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.