Legal Opinion
Sullins v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 23, 2007No. 466, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice.
Jerome Sullins (“Sullins”) appeals from his Superior Court convictions and sentences on various drug charges. Sullins claims that the Superior Court reversibly erred in: (1) denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on Double Jeopardy grounds after the Superior Court declared a mistrial; and (2) permitting the State to introduce testimony that Sullins was under probation supervision at the time of his arrest. We find no merit to Sullins’ claims and, therefore, affirm.
FACTS
On April 21, 2004, Delaware State Police Detective Vincent Clemons (“Detective Clemons”) learned from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Caulk v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.