Legal Opinion

State v. Meador

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1962No. 36156PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellants Clausing and wife and Deer and wife appeal from the apportionment of a condemnation award. The judgment denies appellants any portion of the award, from which they appeal.

The facts may be summarized as follows:

Respondents Di Pietro and wife are fee owners of the property, a building and the land on which it is situated in King County.

In June, 1953, Di Pietro leased the north portion of the building for a term of 10 years, which lease was subsequently assigned to respondent Kelly’s Drug, Inc. In June, 1956, Di Pietro leased the south portion of the building to Kelly’s Drug, Inc.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Struntz v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. CalkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McLennan v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Pierce County v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Olin v. GoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Brickum Investment Co. v. Vernham Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Jensen v. OK Investment CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. SpencerWashington Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API