Legal Opinion
Pierce County v. King
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 1955No. 33288PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
Mr. and Mrs. Potter were the owners of lots three and four in Block 1012, Map of New Tacoma. On June 1,1951, they agreed to sell the premises to Mr. and Mrs. King. The contract provided for a purchase price of eighteen thousand dollars, payable three thousand dollars down, and the balance in monthly installments of one hundred dollars, and no more, plus interest on the balance at the rate of five per cent per annum. The contract contained a forfeiture clause and time was made of the essence. The vendees agreed to keep the premises insured and to pay all the taxes and assessments thereon.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Creameries Co. v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- North Coast Railway Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Pacific National Bank v. Bremerton Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- World Exhibit Corp. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Austin v. Capitol Livestock Auction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re McDanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.