Legal Opinion

McLennan v. Grant

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1894No. 1059PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Cowrt, Clallam, County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

— The appellants brought this action under the unlawful detainer act to recover from the respondents possession of certain real estate situated in the city of Port Angeles, described in the complaint as follows:

“Beginning at a point on the northerly side of Front street in said city, fifty feet in a westerly direction from the intersection of the northerly side of said Front street *604with the westerly side of Laurel street in said city; thence in a westerly direction along the northerly side of Front street twenty-five feet; thence at right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Jackson ex dem. Schaick v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Jackson ex dem. Webber v. HarsenNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Bulkley v. DevineIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Chehalis School District No. 302Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Werts' Heirs v. VickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. MafridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McCourtie v. BaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. MeadorWashington Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API