Legal Opinion
Brickum Investment Co. v. Vernham Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 12, 1987No. 15676-4-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
The appellants, George and Linda Land, appeal from the order denying their motion to vacate a default judgment entered in an unlawful detainer action. They contend that the trial court erred in denying the motion because the judgment was void for want of jurisdiction. We agree with the Lands, and therefore reverse the trial court's order denying the motion to vacate.
Facts
Brickum Investment Company held a ground lease on commercial property located in Whatcom County. In May 1979, Brickum agreed to assign its tenant's interest under the ground lease to George Land. George Land and Brickum set…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Munden v. HazelriggWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Olin v. GoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Mid-City Materials, Inc. v. Heater Beaters Custom FireplacesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Kennedy v. Sundown Speed Marine, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. KhaniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- In Re the Marriage of MarkowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Italian Fisherman, Inc. v. MiddlemasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.