Legal Opinion

Nickels v. Napolilli

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2001No. S-9243, S-9283PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I,. INTRODUCTION

Ruth Nickels performed farm chores for Noel and Nancy Napolilli in exchange for living in a cabin on their property and some monetary compensation. While she lived in this cabin, Nickels injured both her arm and back. Because the Napolillis did not have workers' compensation insurance, Nickels pursued compensation for the injuries through a lawsuit that alleged breach of the employment contract. The trial court dismissed Nickels's claims, finding that the Alaska Workers' Compensation Act does not permit a breach of contract claim based upon the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Searfus v. Northern Gas CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs MotorhomesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carr-Gottstein Properties, Ltd. Partnership v. BenedictAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Trudell v. HibbertAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API