Legal Opinion

Searfus v. Northern Gas Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1970No. 1148PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Appellant Alydane Searfus brought an action for personal injuries against appel-lee Northern Gas. In its answer, Northern Gas denied any negligence on its part, asserted that Alydane Searfus was contribu-torily negligent, and as a separate affirmative defense contended that since appellant was its employee at the time the accident happened her sole remedy was under the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act. A superior court jury returned a general verdict in Northern Gas’ favor and by special interrogatory found that Alydane Searfus was an employee of Northern Gas.

The gist of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Thorsheim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Taylor v. Interior Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. M-K Rivers v. SchleifmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Whaley v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API