Searfus v. Northern Gas Company
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Appellant Alydane Searfus brought an action for personal injuries against appel-lee Northern Gas. In its answer, Northern Gas denied any negligence on its part, asserted that Alydane Searfus was contribu-torily negligent, and as a separate affirmative defense contended that since appellant was its employee at the time the accident happened her sole remedy was under the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act. A superior court jury returned a general verdict in Northern Gas’ favor and by special interrogatory found that Alydane Searfus was an employee of Northern Gas.
The gist of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Thorsheim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Taylor v. Interior Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- M-K Rivers v. SchleifmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Whaley v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.