Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Kimbrough
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 24, 1971No. 43554PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Vice Chief Justice.
This action instituted September 8, 1967, by Addie C., Jr., William and Wanda Kim-brough, plaintiffs, against Dan H. Mitchell, defendant, charges in their petition that the defendant “agreed to lend the plaintiffs the sum of $4515.00 for a period of 36 months on the condition that the plaintiffs would pay to defendant for the loan of said money for said space of time, the sum of $3000.00 as interest.” The petition further alleged that plaintiffs “besides thereafter paying said sum of $4515.00 on or about the 17th day of December, 1965, did pay and the defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Early v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Onstott v. OsborneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Madill Bank and Trust Co. v. HerrmannCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Craft v. ChopraCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Wise v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Continental Natural Gas, Inc. v. Midcoast Natural Gas, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.