Madill Bank and Trust Co. v. Herrmann
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY, Judge:
Appellants bring this appeal from a jury verdict awarding Appellee recovery on a promissory note. Appellee Madill Bank and Trust filed suit against Appellants George Herrmann and Buel Lasley to recover on a promissory note, alleging that Appellants were co-makers on the note. Appellants interposed general denials, and in defense asserted that they had been induced to sign the note by the fraud of Appellee Bank and its officers, that their signatures had been obtained on the note by virtue of misrepresentations and/or mutual mistakes of material facts, and that the Appellee Bank…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
- James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Treadway v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Bourke v. Western Business Products, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.