Legal Opinion
Onstott v. Osborne
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 1966No. 40907PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Chief Justice.
There is involved here an action for damages for fraudulent statements alleged to have been made by the defendant in connection with the sale of certain real estate. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from the action of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to his amended petition. Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleges in his amended petition that on the Sth day of February, 1963, he entered into a written contract with the defendant to purchase certain lands located in Oklahoma County.
A copy of contract is attached to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Gutelius v. SisemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- McDaniel v. QuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
3Cited by14 opinions
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- CITATION CO. REALTORS, INC. v. LyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Dawson v. TindellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Sokolosky v. Tulsa Orthopaedic Associates, Inc. Pension Trust for EmployeesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.