Legal Opinion
Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs & Washington Legal Foundation v. Von Eschenbach
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 2, 2006No. 04-5350PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs (“the Alliance”) *472seeks to enjoin the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) from continuing to enforce a policy barring the sale of new drugs that the FDA has determined, after Phase I trials on human beings, are sufficiently safe for expanded human testing (hereafter “post-Phase I investigational new drugs”). More specifically, the Alliance seeks access to potentially life-saving post-Phase I investigational…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von EschenbachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Walker v. SeldmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Von EschenbachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.