Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS, with whom Chief Judge GINSBURG joins.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether the Constitution provides terminally ill patients a right of access to experimental drugs that have passed limited safety trials but have not been proven safe and effective. The district court held there is no such right. A divided panel of this Court held there is. Because we conclude that there is no fundamental right “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” of access to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Hunter Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sanders v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Ryan-White v. BrysonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.