Legal Opinion
Walker v. Seldman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 18, 2007No. Civil Action 06-603 (GK)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
The claims of Plaintiffs Le Bon Bruce Walker (“Walker”) and Selker, LLC (“Selker”)arise from the disposition of real property and money by Selker’s then managing member, Defendant Neil Seldman (“Seldman”). 1 Defendants are numerous individuals and business entities that were involved, to varying degrees, in the purchase or sale of certain real estate. 2 In his Second Amended Complaint, Walker argues that the transactions at issue support claims for the following: 1) violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mesumbe v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Crowder v. Bierman, Geesing, and Ward LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Poblete v. Indymac BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Jenson v. U.S. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Youngin's Auto Body v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.