Legal Opinion
Williams v. Krieger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 24, 1973No. 73 Civ. 53 (MP)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
POLLACK, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order compelling de*144fendant to answer interrogatories and requests for admissions. Pro se plaintiff Williams is suing his lawyer, defendant Krieger, charging him with negligent handling of his criminal case. The interrogatories and requests for admissions will be considered separately.1
I. The Requests for Admissions
Pursuant to Rule 36, Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant was served with a set of requests for admissions of six items. Rule 36 states, in pertinent part:
A party may serve upon any other party a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States of America Ex Rel. Willie Seals, Jr. v. Martin J. Wiman, Warden, Kilby Prison, Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States of America for the Use of Weston & Brooker Company, a Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- P.R.S. International, Inc. v. Shred Pax Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Coach, Inc. v. Horizon Trading USA Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.