Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Kushman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

The appellant issued two life insurance policies upon the life of the respondent Alexander Kushman. The respondent Esther Kushman is the beneficiary named in each policy. Each policy contained a disability and double indemnity provision.

The insured filed a claim with the appellant claiming to have become totally and permanently disabled. The claim was allowed and the company waived the payment of premiums and paid to the insured monthly the amount called for in the policies until it had paid $6,750. The complaint in this action alleges that appellant then dis covered that the policies were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Travelers Insurance v. PomerantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Manhattan Life Insurance v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  2. Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Blair v. New York Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Braun v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API