Legal Opinion
Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff makes three motions: One, for an order under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, striking out paragraph 26 from the defendant’s answer and paragraphs 37 to 47 inclusive, and paragraphs 49 and 50 from the defendant’s counterclaim on the ground that the matter alleged in said paragraphs is redundant, immaterial, impertinent and scandalous. Two, for an order under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing these same paragraphs and in addition paragraphs 51 and 53 of defendant’s counterclaim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Winget v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Gerli v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tel-Mor Garage CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Reliable Machine Works, Inc. v. Furtex Machine Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Sheldon-Claire Co. v. Judson Roberts Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. FeracoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945