Legal Opinion

Reliable Machine Works, Inc. v. Furtex Machine Corp. of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves pursuant to (1), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 12(b) (6), 28 U.S. C.A., to strike paragraphs 8 and 9 of defendant’s counterclaim; (2) Rule 56(b) for a summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim; and, in the event that any portion of the counterclaim is not stricken, for separate trials of plaintiff’s action and the counterclaim and for an order placing plaintiff’s action on the non-jury calendar.

Plaintiff charges defendant with infringement of a patent on a machine used for the reconditioning of fur and fur garments, and seeks equitable relief…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. Merrimac Hat Corp. v. Crown Overall Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thurston v. Setab Computer InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Mistretta v. S. S. Ocean EvelynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API