Legal Opinion

Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. Feraco

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1945No. 4405PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiffs to strike certain matter from the answer of F. Feraco, defendant and third-party plaintiff, as immaterial, insufficient in law, failing to set forth a defense to the cause of action, and not responsive to the issue made under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(f), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The complaint alleges that defendant, a common carrier, entered into an oral contract with plaintiffs for the transportation of certain machinery from Philadelphia to Cressona, Pennsylvania; that the machinery was seriously damaged while in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Eckert v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Willock v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. RenkenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
  5. Dysart v. Remington Rand, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Gennaro v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API