Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions by the plaintiff (1) to dismiss the Third separate defense of the amended answer, and (2) for a bill of particulars of various allegations of the Second and Third counterclaims of the amended answer.
The motion to dismiss the Third separate defense is denied. I think this defense is sufficient under the Morton Salt case, Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488, 62 S.Ct. 402, 86 L.Ed. 363; as now pleaded, it meets the objection sustained by Judge Goddard with respect to a similar defense in the former pleading. 2 F.R.D. 487.
The motion for a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oliver Gintel, Inc. v. Koslow's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1973