Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Drumright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 1923No. 11253PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff in error to cancel a guardian’s deed executed by the guardian of Joseley Tiger, a full-'blood Creek Indian. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, from which the plaintiff has appealed. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff contends that the petition is so defective as not to confer jurisdiction on the county court to order the sale. The petition in the case, omitting the caption and verification, is in the following language:

“Comes now John Bruner, as the guardian of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Mohr v. ManierreSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Johnson v. FurchtbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Vacuum Oil Co. v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Calkin v. WolcottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Harrison v. OrwigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API