Legal Opinion

Ruse v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1999No. 65679-7PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

— Everett Ruse quit his job because of severe

back pain, and the Department of Labor and Industries denied his subsequent workers’ compensation claim. We affirm baséd upon Ruse’s failure to prove the causal connection between his disability and his employment.

FACTS

For a full discussion of the facts, see Ruse v. Department *4of Labor & Indus., 90 Wn. App. 448, 966 P.2d 909 (1998). Our recitation here is brief. Everett Ruse worked in heavy labor positions for most of his life and was forced to quit his job on August 17, 1989, because of severe back pain. Ruse filed a claim for workers’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. McClelland v. ITT Rayonier, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Spalding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2000

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API