Legal Opinion
Duckworth v. City of Bonney Lake
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1978No. 44779PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
This is an appeal from a summary declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional a portion of the Bonney Lake zoning ordinance.
Respondents, Mr. and Mrs. S. Lloyd Duckworth (Duckworths), own a lot in the RS zone of appellant City of Bonney Lake. In 1976, the City granted a building permit which authorized the Duckworths to place a mobile home on their lot. Thereafter the City apparently revoked the permit on the ground that placement of mobile homes in the RS single family residence zone is not a permitted use. The Duckworths sought a declaratory judgment that there is "no prohibition in the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- City of Brookside Village v. ComeauTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hubbard v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.