Legal Opinion
Saklatwalla v. Marburg
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 5, 1949No. 5487PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of one count to appellee.
The count reads as follows:
A low alloy steel containing 0.05 to 0.14% carbon, 0.07 to 0.18% phosphorus, 0.30 to 0.50% copper, 0.10 to 0.30% manganese, 0.50 to 1.50% chromium and 0.03 to 0.18% titanium, the balance being substantially all commercial steel.
The count did not appear as a claim in the involved applications of either party, serial No. 454,835 of appellee, filed August 14,1942, and serial No. 496,769 of appellant, filed July 30,1943; but…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glue Co. v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Brady Brass Co. v. Ajax Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Churchward International Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.