Legal Opinion

Brady Brass Co. v. Ajax Metal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 21, 1908No. 67PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from, an interlocutory decree of the Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, in a suit charging infringement of letters patent No. 655,402, for an alloy for antifriction bearings. The decree sústains the validity of the patent, .and finds infringement. The specifications and claim are, as follows:

“One object of tbe present invention is to fill a recognized want and provide an alloy for journal bearings which shall hold up within itself more lead than was heretofore possible without the use of nickel, which is claimed in our applications serially…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Standard Oil Co. of California v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. General Metals Powder Co. v. S. K. Wellman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API