Legal Opinion
Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 16, 2007No. 3:06-cr-00235PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Currently pending before the court is a motion to dismiss by the defendant (Docket No. 74), the plaintiffs’ response thereto (Docket No. 80), and the defendant’s reply to that response (Docket No. 90). For the reasons explained herein, the defendant’s motion will be DENIED.
I. Introduction
This is an action for retiree health insurance benefits brought by eight former employees of the defendant Caterpillar, Inc. (“Caterpillar”) and one surviving spouse. On March 28, 2006, Plaintiffs Winnett, Jackson-Chittum, and Harris filed this action in this court.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Winnett v. CATERPILLAR, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Hollowell v. Cincinnati Ventilating Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Gary Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Winnett v. CATERPILLAR INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.