Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are retired workers from Defendant Caterpillar. They argue that Caterpillar breached its promise to provide lifetime retiree medical benefits at no cost when it began charging them for a portion of their medical care. Most of their claims turn on whether a 1988 collective labor agreement provided workers with a right to no-cost retiree medical benefits that vested as soon as the worker became eligible for retirement or a pension. We hold that it did not. Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.
I
The International Union,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Derrick Taylor v. Angela OwensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Pittsburgh MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 66Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Hoogerheide v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.