Legal Opinion

Schuyt v. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 1, 1987No. 80 Civ. 506 (RJW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits following a two-week bench trial. Plaintiff, a shareholder in the Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc. (“Prime Reserve Fund” or the “Fund”) brought this action pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seg. (“ICA”), asserting three claims for relief. Count I, asserted against defendants T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates” or the “Adviser”), raises a claim for excessive fees under section 36(b) of the ICA. 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b). Count II,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,393 Rosalind Fogel and Gerald Fogel v. George A. Chestnutt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Strougo v. BEA ASSOCIATESDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. In re Blackrock Mut. Funds Advisory Fee Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. In re Evergreen Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API