Legal Opinion
Strougo v. BEA ASSOCIATES
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 2002No. 98 CIV 3725 RWSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Credit Suisse Asset Management LLC (“CSAM”), formerly known as BEA Associates, the investment adviser for the Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), has moved under Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) of plaintiff Robert Strougo (“Strougo”), a shareholder in the Fund, which alleged violations of Section 36(a) and 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”), as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(a), (b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
Strougo has been a determined litigant,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rome v. ArcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. BassiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In re Evergreen Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Halebian v. BervDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Equant Integrations Services, Inc. v. United Rentals (North America), Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.