Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,393 Rosalind Fogel and Gerald Fogel v. George A. Chestnutt, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
More than four years after the First Circuit decided Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369 (1971), reversing 316 F.Supp. 31 (D.Mass. 1970), concerning the duty of the managers of a mutual fund to recapture brokerage commissions for the benefit of the fund, this court is confronted with the problem for the first time. In reviewing Judge Wyatt’s dismissal on the merits of a recapture action in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 383 F.Supp. 914 (1974), we must determine whether we agree with the First Circuit’s decision and, if so, whether it applies to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.