Legal Opinion

Prideaux v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1936No. Civil No. 3743PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus against Ana Frohmiller, as state auditor. It seeks to compel the auditor to audit, allow, and draw a warrant for a claim of $6 for services rendered by plaintiff, Prideaux, to the state tax commission in the preparation of a defense to a suit in the United States District Court for Arizona by the United Verde Copper Company against said commission, involving the company’s tax assessments for the year 1933; also a claim for $6 for like services in preparation of a defense to a suit by the Verde Tunnel & Smelter Railroad Company against said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Crane v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Vandegrift v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lefebvre v. CallaghanArizona Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Wells v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Meredith v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API